{"id":1564,"date":"2024-03-29T19:04:06","date_gmt":"2024-03-29T19:04:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sinatootoonian.com\/?p=1564"},"modified":"2025-12-27T16:05:31","modified_gmt":"2025-12-27T16:05:31","slug":"wrangling-quartics-v","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sinatootoonian.com\/index.php\/2024\/03\/29\/wrangling-quartics-v\/","title":{"rendered":"Wrangling quartics, V"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Yesterday I went to discuss the problem with one of my colleagues. He had the interesting idea of modelling $S$, and especially $S^2$, as low rank, in particular as $S = s_1 e_1 e_1^T$. That is, shifting the focus on $S$ from $Z$. I tried this out today, and although it didn&#8217;t quite pan out, the discussion we had sent me on a useful trajectory that I will describe in this post.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As always in this series, the equation whose solutions we&#8217;re trying to understand is \\begin{align}S^2 Z^2 S^2 &#8211; S C S = \\lambda (Z^{-1} &#8211; I).\\label{main}\\tag{1}\\end{align} I returned to approximating $Z$, and considered approximations for which $Z^2$ and $Z^{-1}$ are in the same &#8216;family&#8217;. For example, if $Z \\approx I + uu^T$, then<br>\\begin{align} Z^2 &amp;= I + (2 + u^T u) uu^T, \\\\Z^{-1} &amp;= I &#8211; {1 \\over 1 + u^T u} uu^T.\\end{align} Both of these are of the form $I + \\beta uu^T$, so there might be some hope of equating coefficients of $uu^T$ on the left and right sides of $\\Eqn{main}$. When I plugged in this form for $Z$, I was able to derive an interesting eigenvalue relationship that $u$ satisfies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I found earlier in the week that $Z$ can be approximated as a low-rank update to a diagonal matrix, as shown on the far left below:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"340\" src=\"https:\/\/sinatootoonian.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/image-9-1024x340.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1572\" srcset=\"https:\/\/sinatootoonian.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/image-9-1024x340.png 1024w, https:\/\/sinatootoonian.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/image-9-300x100.png 300w, https:\/\/sinatootoonian.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/image-9-768x255.png 768w, https:\/\/sinatootoonian.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/image-9-1536x510.png 1536w, https:\/\/sinatootoonian.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/image-9-2048x680.png 2048w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><em>Approximation of $Z$ (left) by a multiple of the identity, a diagonal matrix, and rank 1 updates to these.<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Unfortunately, the diagonal matrix is not quite the identity. In particular, its first value is very close to zero:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"690\" height=\"293\" src=\"https:\/\/sinatootoonian.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/image-10.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1575\" style=\"width:650px;height:auto\" srcset=\"https:\/\/sinatootoonian.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/image-10.png 690w, https:\/\/sinatootoonian.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/image-10-300x127.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 690px) 100vw, 690px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>However, the success I had with deriving an eigenvalue equation for the $I + uu^T$ approximation motivated me to try to derive one here as well. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We first need $Z^2$ and $Z^{-1}$:<br>\\begin{align} Z &amp;\\approx D + uu^T, \\\\<br>Z^2 &amp;\\approx D^2 +D uu^T + uu^T D + (u^T u) uu^T,\\\\<br>Z^{-1} &amp;\\approx D^{-1} &#8211; {D^{-1} uu^T D^{-1} \\over 1 + u^T D u}.\\end{align}<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Plugging these into $\\Eqn{main}$ gives<br>$$ {S^2 (D^2 + D uu^T + uu^T D + (u^T u) uu^T )S^2 &#8211; S C S \\over \\lambda} + I = D^{-1} &#8211; {D^{-1} u u^T D^{-1} \\over 1 + u^T D^{-1} u}.$$<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Multiplying both sides by $u$ gives<br>$$  {(\\Lambda_1 + \\Lambda_2 + \\Lambda_3 + \\Lambda_4) u &#8211; S C S u \\over \\lambda} = \\left[\\left(1 &#8211;  {u^T D^{-1} u\\over 1 + u^T D^{-1} u}\\right) D^{-1} &#8211; I\\right]u,$$ where I&#8217;ve defined the diagonal matrices \\begin{align} \\Lambda_1 &amp;= S^2 D^2 S^2, &amp; \\Lambda_2 &amp;= (u^T S^2 u)S^2 D,\\\\ \\Lambda_3 &amp;= (u^T D S^2 u) S^2, &amp; \\Lambda_4 &amp;= (u^T u) (u^T S^2 u)  S^2.\\end{align}<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Then, largely because of how small $D_{11}$ is, a few amazing things happen. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>First, the matrix on righthand side becomes approximately $-I + 2e_1e_1^T$. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Second, the elements of $\\Lambda_4$, especially the first few, are much larger than the rest, so we can approximate $$ \\sum_{i=1}^4 \\Lambda_i \\approx \\Lambda_4.$$ Although e.g. $\\Lambda_1$  has $S^4$ in it, the presence of $D^2$ appears enough to squash its influence. $\\Lambda_4$ is the only term that doesn&#8217;t have $D$ in it, and it dominates the others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Third, $|\\Lambda_4 \/ \\lambda|  \\gg 1$ for almost all the elements, so we can ignore the righthand side. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>So, after these three amazing effects, we end up with <br>$$ \\Lambda_4 u = (u^T u) (u^T S^2 u) S^2 u \\approx S C S u.$$ Left multiplying by $S^{-1}$ we get $$  (u^T u) (u^T S^2 u) S u \\approx C S u.$$ In other words, $S u$ is an eigenvector of $C$ with eigenvalue $(u^T u) (u^T S^2 u).$<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Not quite sure what this all means, but an interesting result. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>$$\\begin{flalign*} &amp;&amp; \\phantom{a} &amp; \\hfill \\square \\end{flalign*}$$<br><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Yesterday I went to discuss the problem with one of my colleagues. He had the interesting idea of modelling $S$, and especially $S^2$, as low rank, in particular as $S = s_1 e_1 e_1^T$. That is, shifting the focus on $S$ from $Z$. I tried this out today, and although it didn&#8217;t quite pan out, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1,148],"tags":[48,49,40],"class_list":["post-1564","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-blog","category-research","tag-eigenvalues","tag-low-rank","tag-work"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sinatootoonian.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1564","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sinatootoonian.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sinatootoonian.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sinatootoonian.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sinatootoonian.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1564"}],"version-history":[{"count":26,"href":"https:\/\/sinatootoonian.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1564\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1592,"href":"https:\/\/sinatootoonian.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1564\/revisions\/1592"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sinatootoonian.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1564"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sinatootoonian.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1564"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sinatootoonian.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1564"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}